Re: [PATCH 2/4] signal: Make flush_sigqueue() use free_q to release memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/25, Christopher Lameter wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> > Only for SLAB and SLUB.  SLOB requires that you pass a pointer to the
> > slab cache; it has no way to look up the slab cache from the object.
>
> Well then we could either fix SLOB to conform to the others or add a
> kmem_cache_free_rcu() variant.

Speaking of struct sigqueue we can simply use call_rcu() but see my previous
email, I am not sure this is the best option.

Oleg.




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux