Re: [PATCH 2/4] signal: Make flush_sigqueue() use free_q to release memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> Options:
>
> 1. Dispense with this optimisation and always store the size of the
> object before the object.

I think thats how SLOB handled it at some point in the past. Lets go back
to that setup so its compatible with the other allocators?



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux