Re: [PATCH] libsemanage: genhomedircon - improve handling large groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx> writes:

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:45 PM Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

getgrnam_r() uses a preallocated buffer to store a structure containing the broken-out fields of the record in the group database. The size of this buffer is usually sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX) == 1024 and it is not enough for groups with a large number of users. In these cases, getgrnam_r() returns -1 and sets errno to ERANGE and the caller can
retry with a larger buffer.

Fixes:
$ semanage login -a -s user_u -r s0-s0:c1.c2 '%largegroup'
libsemanage.semanage_direct_commit: semanage_genhomedircon returned error code -1. (Numerical result out of range).
OSError: Numerical result out of range

Signed-off-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 libsemanage/src/genhomedircon.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libsemanage/src/genhomedircon.c b/libsemanage/src/genhomedircon.c
index 591941fb..ac376671 100644
--- a/libsemanage/src/genhomedircon.c
+++ b/libsemanage/src/genhomedircon.c
@@ -1077,10 +1077,20 @@ static int get_group_users(genhomedircon_settings_t * s,

        const char *grname = selogin + 1;

-       if (getgrnam_r(grname, &grstorage, grbuf,
-                       (size_t) grbuflen, &group) != 0) {
-               goto cleanup;
+       errno = 0;
+       while (
+ (retval = getgrnam_r(grname, &grstorage, grbuf, (size_t) grbuflen, &group)) != 0 &&
+               errno == ERANGE
+       ) {
+               char *new_grbuf;
+               grbuflen *= 2;
+               new_grbuf = realloc(grbuf, grbuflen);
+               if (new_grbuf == NULL)
+                       goto cleanup;
+               grbuf = new_grbuf;
        }

Hello,
When reading this for loop, I am concerned about the case where the
member list exceeds 2Go on a system with a 32-bit CPU (where
sizeof(long) = 4). Even if it seems very unlikely, if this ever
happens, the loop will become infinite. Would you agree with adding
"&& grbuflen > 0" to the condition of the while statement?

Makes sense, I'll add it. Thanks.

Anyway, if you do not agree, this patch looks good to me.
Acked-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Nicolas

+       if (retval == -1)
+               goto cleanup;

According to the man page this check is not correct. - "In case of
error, an error number is returned, and NULL is stored in *result."

I'll fix it as well.


        if (group == NULL) {
ERR(s->h_semanage, "Can't find group named %s\n", grname);
--
2.20.1





[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux