On Tue 08-08-17 09:34:15, Paul Moore wrote: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri 04-08-17 13:12:04, Paul Moore wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > >> > Btw. Should I resend the patch or somebody will take it from this email > >> > thread? > >> > >> No, unless your mailer mangled the patch I should be able to pull it > >> from this thread. However, I'm probably going to let this sit until > >> early next week on the odd chance that anyone else wants to comment on > >> the flag choice. I'll send another reply once I merge the patch. > > > > OK, there is certainly no hurry for merging this. Thanks! > > -- > > Michal Hocko > > SUSE Labs > > Merged into selinux/next with this patch description, and your > sign-off (I had to munge the description a bit based on the thread). > Are you okay with this, especially your sign-off? Yes. Thanks! > > commit 476accbe2f6ef69caeebe99f52a286e12ac35aee > Author: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu Aug 3 10:11:52 2017 +0200 > > selinux: use GFP_NOWAIT in the AVC kmem_caches > > There is a strange __GFP_NOMEMALLOC usage pattern in SELinux, > specifically GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC which doesn't make much > sense. GFP_ATOMIC on its own allows to access memory reserves while > __GFP_NOMEMALLOC dictates we cannot use memory reserves. Replace this > with the much more sane GFP_NOWAIT in the AVC code as we can tolerate > memory allocation failures in that code. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > paul moore > www.paul-moore.com -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
