On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri 04-08-17 13:12:04, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] >> > Btw. Should I resend the patch or somebody will take it from this email >> > thread? >> >> No, unless your mailer mangled the patch I should be able to pull it >> from this thread. However, I'm probably going to let this sit until >> early next week on the odd chance that anyone else wants to comment on >> the flag choice. I'll send another reply once I merge the patch. > > OK, there is certainly no hurry for merging this. Thanks! > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs Merged into selinux/next with this patch description, and your sign-off (I had to munge the description a bit based on the thread). Are you okay with this, especially your sign-off? commit 476accbe2f6ef69caeebe99f52a286e12ac35aee Author: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Aug 3 10:11:52 2017 +0200 selinux: use GFP_NOWAIT in the AVC kmem_caches There is a strange __GFP_NOMEMALLOC usage pattern in SELinux, specifically GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC which doesn't make much sense. GFP_ATOMIC on its own allows to access memory reserves while __GFP_NOMEMALLOC dictates we cannot use memory reserves. Replace this with the much more sane GFP_NOWAIT in the AVC code as we can tolerate memory allocation failures in that code. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
