Re: [RFC] Split up policycoreutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> policycoreutils started life as a small set of utilities that were
> necessary or at least widely used in production on a SELinux system.
> Over time though it has grown to include many optional components, and
> even within a given subdirectory (e.g. sepolicy) there seem to be a
> number of components that should be optional (e.g. the dbus service).
> I'd like to propose that we move a number of components out of
> policycoreutils into their own top-level subdirectory (possibly grouping
> some of the related ones together).
[... gui, mcstrans, restorecond, sandbox, semodule_*, sepolicy ...]

I don't see a problem going forward with this. We'll have some package
management effort to do in Gentoo then (we haven't split that like
Fedora did, but used USE flags to toggle the building of certain
areas) but that's manageable.

Wkr,
  Sven Vermeulen
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux