On 6/30/2016 10:10 AM, Yuval Shaia wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:52:49PM +0300, Dan Jurgens wrote: > >> +static void (*ib_flush_callback)(void); > Do we really want to have such ib_ prefix in security/ directory? > >> + if (ib_flush_callback) >> + ib_flush_callback(); > How about some generic mechanism (such as a list) in case more > modules/drivers would like to register callbacks? > ( assuming this is no longer RFC :) ) > Paul Moore and I were having a higher level discussion about this in the 00/12 thread. I think your suggestion makes sense, perhaps Paul will weigh in when he reaches this patch. _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
