-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I am trying to understand an issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426704#c20 "Suggestion: load_user() to pass NULL if pw is NULL, and change get_security_context() to handle a NULL name by directly calling get_default_context() on "system_u" rather than calling getseuserbyname at all. Then we don't need a system_u entry in seusers." Is the suggestion above about hard coding "system_u"? Also about: "Then we don't need a system_u entry in seusers." We seem to have the above anyway, even with the system_u hard coded. Wondering whether it was left in for some other reason? Cronie refuses to run in an environment where system_u is not available when system_u is hard coded like that (i believe): https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/cronie.git/commit/?id=e5280235809844f5 4d5956ec281472b63dcfc3f4 - -- Key fingerprint = 5F4D 3CDB D3F8 3652 FBD8 02D5 3B6C 5F1D 2C7B 6B02 https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3B6C5F1D2C7B6B02 Dominick Grift -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJXH1C7AAoJECV0jlU3+UdpE7kMAK2pbticmAvp5FKELXOoO+hX eP0CvSFMHa34upu2AH4FJeJIv3JgJagLbBtRLPjJ9otRZbq6zh7HIPUJ9ltk+SI6 QwBAxr0/DDUhKNRU01v1A6S/FFAyt7m+YUZ1YUI7UHgFDkH0ox0F+XLuzwH8WbGy YI1S+DONV46gW55GluBO7N7th44kunpAZ0slU4GpLzjfz+ScS0Y6GG/Fdnnb0hTz M1/UeOi0bEqvUjJhTpvUiy5yu/xDPVhZ36cuBOG9hbTuBO7CIJvc0EnxXYBBIyPw bwvPxUTumUTOsHSUFVJ9s61MCIZwzOngwIYPK9qs3EivgWC5Xg3jzOsVlxjBRMWZ JVT1hO3gq0V9OqkmOFYH0hd0E9Q/bhqlXlOXXp89S2BJfhIUjtqq3tWbayO5wVMg aUSyobadvn2XF35jt+gPXfoiTO0SC8VXJ905V5M9KNv0lKlu0wpo7/oQ3YUrO82/ GIwZhZAoYsT0afXNbZPYfzi2MpZUzTK4xzlyJlJFvQ== =6/EC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
