On 04/07/2016 11:06 AM, James Carter wrote:
Since CIL treats files as modules and does not have a separate
module statement it can cause confusion when a Refpolicy module
has a name that is different than its base filename because older
SELinux userspaces will refer to the module by its module name while
a CIL-based userspace will refer to it by its filename.
Because of this, provide a warning message when compiling a module and
the output filename is different than the module name.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
checkpolicy/checkmodule.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/checkpolicy/checkmodule.c b/checkpolicy/checkmodule.c
index 5957d29..d807620 100644
--- a/checkpolicy/checkmodule.c
+++ b/checkpolicy/checkmodule.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <libgen.h>
#include <sepol/module_to_cil.h>
#include <sepol/policydb/policydb.h>
@@ -258,6 +259,20 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
}
}
+ if (policy_type != POLICY_BASE && outfile) {
+ char *mod_name = modpolicydb.name;
+ char *out_path = strdup(outfile);
+ char *out_name = basename(out_path);
+ char *separator = strrchr(out_name, '.');
+ if (separator) {
+ *separator = '\0';
+ }
+ if (strcmp(mod_name, out_name) != 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Warning: SELinux userspace will refer to the module from %s as %s rather than as %s\n", file, out_name, mod_name);
+ }
+ free(out_path);
+ }
+
if (modpolicydb.policy_type == POLICY_BASE && !cil) {
/* Verify that we can successfully expand the base module. */
policydb_t kernpolicydb;
Why not fail rather then warn. Don't let me do stupid things...
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
