Petr Lautrbach wrote:
reserver_port_t was omitted in 'semanage port -l'. There seems to be no
reason for that nowadays therefore we can list it.
Resolves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225806
Signed-off-by: Petr Lautrbach<plautrba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied.
---
policycoreutils/semanage/seobject.py | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/policycoreutils/semanage/seobject.py b/policycoreutils/semanage/seobject.py
index c52be75..3b0b108 100644
--- a/policycoreutils/semanage/seobject.py
+++ b/policycoreutils/semanage/seobject.py
@@ -1216,8 +1216,6 @@ class portRecords(semanageRecords):
for port in self.plist:
con = semanage_port_get_con(port)
ctype = semanage_context_get_type(con)
- if ctype == "reserved_port_t":
- continue
level = semanage_context_get_mls(con)
proto = semanage_port_get_proto(port)
proto_str = semanage_port_get_proto_str(proto)
@@ -1238,8 +1236,6 @@ class portRecords(semanageRecords):
for port in self.plist:
con = semanage_port_get_con(port)
ctype = semanage_context_get_type(con)
- if ctype == "reserved_port_t":
- continue
proto = semanage_port_get_proto(port)
proto_str = semanage_port_get_proto_str(proto)
low = semanage_port_get_low(port)
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
