Would be nice to have a global system setting regarding whether saving disk space is a priority. Then this could be one of many things that could work differently depending on whether the sysadmin wants to save space. On 26 July 2014 5:45:49 AM AEST, Joshua Brindle <brindle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Stephen Smalley wrote: >> Motivated by: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098446 >> >> I believe this is always safe for booleans because we only set their >> value; we are never adding new ones via semanage, unlike for example >> users, ports, nodes, and interfaces. For the rest, I was wondering >why >> we don't save the linked file and just reuse it on those changes >rather >> than re-linking each time - that seems like it would be >straightforward > >We originally kept the linked copy around and had intended to do what >you are saying above but removed it when the minimal Red Hat guys >complained about the size of it. > >> to do in libsemanage and make those operations significantly faster >and >> less memory intensive. > >_______________________________________________ >Selinux mailing list >Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. >To get help, send an email containing "help" to >Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. -- Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 2 with K-9 Mail. _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
