Re: Debugging sepolgen-ifgen?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/04/2014 01:07 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 08/02/2014 03:19 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I've noticed that on my system, for some interfaces, the results in
>> /var/lib/sepolgen/interface_info are missing file-specific feedback.
>>
>> For instance, consider the kernel_rw_kernel_sysctl() interface, which is
>> coded as follows:
>>
>> interface(`kernel_rw_kernel_sysctl',`
>>         gen_require(`
>>                 type proc_t, sysctl_t, sysctl_kernel_t;
>>         ')
>>
>>         rw_files_pattern($1, { proc_t sysctl_t sysctl_kernel_t }, sysctl_kernel_t)
>>
>>         list_dirs_pattern($1, { proc_t sysctl_t }, sysctl_kernel_t)
>> ')
>>
>> In the interface_info file, I only find the following metadata about this
>> interface:
>>
>> [InterfaceVector kernel_rw_kernel_sysctl $1:source ]
>> $1,sysctl_t,dir,getattr,open,search
>> $1,sysctl_kernel_t,dir,getattr,open,search
>> $1,proc_t,dir,getattr,open,search
>>
>> Shouldn't this at least contain something like this?
>>
>> $1,sysctl_kernel_t,file,write,getattr,lock,open,ioctl,append 
>>
>> Although not critical, it does result in audit2allow -R to not use
>> refpolicy-style interfaces when possible...
>>
>> How can I debug this? I know the file is generated by sepolgen-ifgen, but
>> rerunning doesn't add in any file-related metadata and I'm totally oblivious
>> on how the parsing is done...
> Not sure about that beyond the -d -v options.
> However, this appears to be a regression; despite encountering some syntax errors during parsing,
> sepolgen-ifgen from 21030423 generates a more accurate vector:
>
> [InterfaceVector kernel_rw_kernel_sysctl $1:source ]
> $1,sysctl_t,dir,getattr,open,search
> $1,sysctl_kernel_t,file,write,getattr,read,lock,open,ioctl,append
> $1,sysctl_kernel_t,dir,search,read,lock,ioctl,getattr,open
> $1,proc_t,dir,getattr,open,search
>
> while sepolgen-ifgen from 20131030_4 generates the reduced set you have above.
>
> Seems to have been broken by:
>
> commit 17cc87e56b0241688c119f774f103622b002e0ae
> Author: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Oct 9 17:01:35 2013 -0400
>
>     sepolgen did not work with filename transitions.
>     
>     This patch adds support for it.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Selinux mailing list
> Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
>
>
I don't see anything obviously wrong with that patch?
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux