On 05/23/2014 11:04 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
On 05/23/2014 10:32 AM, Dominick Grift wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 09:15 -0400, James Carter wrote:
Could you give me a little bit more information on what you are doing?
Strange.. It is kind of hard for me to put it any other way.
I have a short 5 minute video that demo's the issue:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hU_yVZJpAyM
If you are not able to view the demo then i guess i will have to find
another way to explain it
I think this is an example of the core problem:
(in foo.bar
(type x))
(in foo
(block bar))
(block foo)
So, an in-statement is inserting into a block that is created by another
in-statement, so there's an order dependence.
So to fix this we need to split up the processing for "in", so that blocks and
macros are processed first?
Jim
--
James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
National Security Agency
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
