On 02/18/2014 07:28 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> agreed completely that a version check makes sense, but i'm pretty >> sure I'll forget about it before I have time to look at it :-( >> > I'm happy to do some implementation work here myself as well. The > obvious thing to do is just to stick the output of pcre_version() into > the file - except there's no space. So we'd need to bump the format > version. > > Now I can do that, but I think it's the kind of thing that needs a bit > of discussion beforehand. Any objections or further thoughts? That's just the library version, right? Not an indication of a format change in the pcre regex necessarily? Any way to get an actual version corresponding to that format? On the last such format change, I believe Dan et al added a trigger to selinux-policy so that it will regenerate the .bin file on any pcre upgrade automatically, so I guess what you describe should work, but it would be nice if we could tie it to actual pcre regex format changes rather than just pcre library versions. > In the meantime though, I'm going to have to hack up my copy of > libselinux from RHEL7 to just ignore the .bin files unconditionally. _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
