Re: Pruning dead/obsolete branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/30/2013 02:56 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
Hi,

There are a number of old branches in the selinux repo that I think can
be safely pruned, but I wanted to confirm first.

The branches other than master are:
- autotools:  last attempt to convert over to using autotools.  Last
commit 2008.

- integration: last attempt to integrate src-policy into master?  Last
commit 2011.

- queue:  Eric's branch for changes queued for merging to master, kind
of a next branch.  Last commit Feb 2013.

- src-policy:  source policy module work.  Last commit 2010.

- src-revert:  Not really sure.  Last commit 2011.

- stable_1_0:  attempt to provide a long term stable series tracking the
1.x versions of selinux userspace for long term distro users.  Last
commit 2008.  Turned out to be pointless because the long term distros
did their own backporting and maintenance.

Any reason to retain any of these branches at this point?




src-revert, src-policy, and integration are all related to CIL with the eventual goal of getting it upstreamed. There is ongoing work with these branches, just not yet committed, so we should at least keep these around.

- Steve

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux