On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:20:38 PM James Morris wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Paul Moore wrote: > > > Why does a branch need to be specified? The changes live in master and my > > > understanding was that if a branch was not explicitly listed then master > > > should be used. > > > > Ok, I'll do that. I'm not going to assume it. > > > > > > git-pull fails in any case. > > > > > > Can you be more explicit? It works for me ... > > > > $ git pull git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux > > You asked to pull from the remote > > 'git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux', but did not specify > > a branch. Because this is not the default configured remote > > for your current branch, you must specify a branch on the command line. > > Looking at your next branch, it looks like you were able to pull successfully > from my master branch ... are you set for 3.12? Yep, thanks. -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
