On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:20:38 PM James Morris wrote: > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Paul Moore wrote: > > Why does a branch need to be specified? The changes live in master and my > > understanding was that if a branch was not explicitly listed then master > > should be used. > > Ok, I'll do that. I'm not going to assume it. > > > > git-pull fails in any case. > > > > Can you be more explicit? It works for me ... > > $ git pull git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux > You asked to pull from the remote > 'git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux', but did not specify > a branch. Because this is not the default configured remote > for your current branch, you must specify a branch on the command line. Looking at your next branch, it looks like you were able to pull successfully from my master branch ... are you set for 3.12? -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
