On 1/7/2013 7:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Casey, > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:01:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Let me ask Andrew's question: Why do you want to do this (what is the >> use case)? What does this gain us? >> >> Also, you should use unique subjects for each of the patches in the >> series. > You probably also want to think a bit harder about the order of the > patches - you should introduce new APIs before you use them and remove > calls to functions before you remove the functions. > The unfortunate reality is that I couldn't find a good way to stage the changes. It's a wonking big set of infrastructure change. I could introduce the security blob abstraction separately but that is a fraction of the change. If it would have gone through mail filters as a single patch I'd have sent it that way. I can spend time on patch presentation, and will if necessary. As it is, I can start getting substantive commentary from beyond the LSM crowd, who have already been extremely cooperative and often critical. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
