On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:39 +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:23 PM, James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 10:44 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > >> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 11:07 +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > >> > And here are the actual hooks: > >> > > >> > 1. rpmRC SECURITYHOOK_INIT_FUNC(rpmts ts, const char *opts) > >> > >> I see that our init func takes a const char *name argument as well; I > >> don't know offhand whether it is truly required (Steve or Jim?). > >> > > > > This is the name of the collection. It is required so that all the > > members of a collection can be grouped together. This is needed because > > all SELinux policy must be installed before applications and files that > > the policy is for. > > I wonder if we can then have a generic init hook for the plugin (as > above) and then > a separate hook to initialize the collection (that could have > collection name and > any other needed variables). The plugins that need to use collection > (like SELinux) > will use this hook, others just ignore it. Would it be reasonable? > I think so. -- James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
