On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:23 -0400, James Carter wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 10:44 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > 7. rpmRC SECURITYHOOK_SCRIPT_EXEC_FUNC(ARGV_const_t argv) > > > > It looks like our rpm_execcon() hook takes more arguments, but they > > aren't truly unique or used, so this seems reasonable to me as a > > simplified interface. > > > > rpm_execcon() is not a part of the collection plugin support. I guess > the plan would be to remove all of the SELinux support built in (such as > the %sepolicy section)? Yes, that's the idea - migrate all of the SELinux support, whether built-in or via the collections plugin interface, into a single plugin architecture that can also be leveraged by others like Tizen/MSSF. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
