On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, lkcl luke <luke.leighton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > We moved off fedora user questions and reference policy... > > almost certainly, yes. the popularity of android and the general... > how-to-say-politely-i-know-lets-use-implicit-tact... level of > intelligence of the average android user is quite likely to swamp the > selinux mailing list and reduce its quality to zero. For Android development the barriers to entry are a lot higher than for general Linux development. So I would expect Android developers to be more dedicated than people who do similar work on an easier platform. In regard to the issue of a separate mailing list, there have been a lot of messages about details of the Android platform that aren't relevant to people who are developing for a Debian or RHEL platform. Having a separate list for such messages seems like a good idea. But messages that concern policy or more mainline SE Linux development should still go to the current two lists even if they concern Android. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
