Re: Is it time to move seandroid policy messages off of the selinux lists and onto there own list?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We moved off fedora user questions and reference policy...

 almost certainly, yes.  the popularity of android and the general...
how-to-say-politely-i-know-lets-use-implicit-tact... level of
intelligence of the average android user is quite likely to swamp the
selinux mailing list and reduce its quality to zero.

 actually what i'd recommend is, if you want the se/android list to
have any level of quality as well, to set up a nice pee aitch pee bee
forum (*1) for all the average se/android users: they will flock to it
and stay the hell away from "non-pretty / scarey woooo" things like
mailing lists.

 i could be wrong, though: anyone who actually wants to deploy the
flask model on top of android has to be a little bit above-average
intelligence, *but*, the fact that se/android is designed differently
[viz: "simpler"] does mitigate against that somewhat, so i stand by
the above recommendations

 l.

(*1 - forum php code obviously *not* running on nsa.gov servers or
even anywhere remotely associated with the nsa.gov domain.
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/06/29/1458234/the-php-singularity
)

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux