On 5/10/2012 6:54 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Failing to allocate a cache entry will only harm performance not
> correctness. Do not consume valuable reserve pages for something
> like that.
Copying to the LSM and SELinux lists.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/selinux/avc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/selinux/avc.c b/security/selinux/avc.c
> index 8ee42b2..75c2977 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/avc.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/avc.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static struct avc_node *avc_alloc_node(void)
> {
> struct avc_node *node;
>
> - node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_node_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_node_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
> if (!node)
> goto out;
>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
