On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 11:31 -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote: > Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > > On 10/14/11 11:57, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> Eric and I have come up with the following syntax for this behaviour. > >> > >> default_trans level dir_file_class_set parent; > > > > I think we want this to be "range" instead of "level", since the field is actually a range. > > > >> default_trans user dir_file_class_set process; > >> default_trans role file parent; > > > > Isn't there a better set of tokens than this? Why not make it default_user, default_role, default_type, and default_range? Creating an object doesn't really imply a transition, so "trans" seems misleading. > > > > I agree with Chris. This will actually let you make things not transition by > default so _trans is misleading. Further, "process" shouldn't be a token since > it is an object class (you couldn't actually parse policy with Eric's patches > could you?). I don't like "parent" as a token either, and SELinux doesn't know > anything about processes and parents anyway. SDS's suggestions a while back are > more appropriate IMO, since SELinux does know what source and target are. Unsurprisingly I agree with my original suggestions. Also, I don't see that you've addressed the issue of range/level defaults needing to specify whether you want to inherit the low level, the high level or the complete range of the source or the target contexts. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.