On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 02:32:03 PM David Howells wrote: > Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We should probably do the same for the security/selinux/netif.c as it > > uses the same logic; David is this something you want to tackle? > > netif.c doesn't use any rcu_dereference*() function directly, though it does > use list_for_each_entry_rcu(). However, I'm not sure that's a problem. > What is it you're referring to? My apologies, the netport.c and netif.c code is very, very similar and whenever I see a patch just for one of the two it causes a reaction that you saw above. While netif.c has a similar function, sel_netif_insert(), it is slightly different and doesn't need a rcu_dereference() ad the netport.c code does. Sorry for the confusion. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
