Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We should probably do the same for the security/selinux/netif.c as it uses > the same logic; David is this something you want to tackle? netif.c doesn't use any rcu_dereference*() function directly, though it does use list_for_each_entry_rcu(). However, I'm not sure that's a problem. What is it you're referring to? David -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
