On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 08:46 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 19:12 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 00:38 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> > > Hello Eric.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 17:17 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 23:12 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You seem to suggest that load_policy -i (and not the kernel) should make
> > > > > sure that init has transitioned to its designated context...
> > > >
> > > > Can't speak for Justin's system.
> > >
> > > That's for sure. But it seems to me that he already stated that it just
> > > loaded plain refpolicy from git on a plain F15 system. Since we are on
> > > the list he might even confirm once again...
> > >
> > > > But that's not what I said. I said
> > > > it's /sbin/init's problem to make sure it did the right thing and to
> > > > handle errors correctly if it failed. If Justin has his box enforcing
> > > > and can boot without loading a policy that's a bug and needs to be
> > > > filed.
> > >
> > > He has loaded the policy.
> > >
> > > The point is that when init does not transition to init_t nothing
> > > happens and the system keeps running with all processes in kernel_t or
> > > insmod_t.
> > >
> > > It surely use to happen with upstream components and policy back at the
> > > beginning of this year (I did test that and reported it to the refpolicy
> > > mailing list).
> > >
> > > Apparently it also happens with Fedora 15 according to what Justin
> > > reported on here when he started this thread...
> > >
> > > Earlier on Daniel Walsh said Fedora and RHEL would crash in such case
> > > (init has not transitioned properly to init_t).
> >
> > Ahhh, different than I was talking sorry. In upstream systemd git the
> > code in question looks like so:
> >
> > /* Transition to the new context */
> > r = label_get_create_label_from_exe(SYSTEMD_BINARY_PATH, &label);
> > if (r < 0 || label == NULL) {
> > log_open();
> > log_error("Failed to compute init label, ignoring.");
> > } else {
> > r = setcon(label);
> >
> > log_open();
> > if (r < 0)
> > log_error("Failed to transition into init label '%s', ignoring.", label);
> >
> > label_free(label);
> > }
> >
> > sds, what do you think, should we make these? We do know the requisite
> > enforce state in this function...
>
> These should be fatal errors if enforcing.
Yes, I agree. Fatal errors and system halt.
This is especially true because the box might not be isolated from the
outside world for network services might be up and running in wrong
contexts.
Thanks.
Guido
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
