On 03/09/2011 10:48 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 03/09/2011 08:06 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 17:26 -0500, Eamon Walsh wrote: >>> Libselinux has reached version 2.0.99 and I need to push a bug fix, just checking to make sure 2.0.100 is fine and won't cause any problems e.g. with upgrades. > >> Shouldn't be a problem. However, it does raise the question of when >> we'll move to 2.1.0. If the version string consists of >> major.minor.revision, then possibly we should be incrementing minor and >> resetting revision whenever there is a new release on >> userspace.selinuxproject.org? > > Make sense to me. Sounds good to me. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
