-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2011 08:06 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 17:26 -0500, Eamon Walsh wrote: >> Libselinux has reached version 2.0.99 and I need to push a bug fix, just checking to make sure 2.0.100 is fine and won't cause any problems e.g. with upgrades. > > Shouldn't be a problem. However, it does raise the question of when > we'll move to 2.1.0. If the version string consists of > major.minor.revision, then possibly we should be incrementing minor and > resetting revision whenever there is a new release on > userspace.selinuxproject.org? > Make sense to me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk13oUEACgkQrlYvE4MpobNdHwCgkTYbCc+K5ese7BudUBVZpkUb VZ8AoKCPhpN3CoZN/LO1GNR5oJ3SwmSM =6VnG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
