On Wed, 5 May 2010, Eric Paris wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 08:50 +1000, James Morris wrote: > > On Mon, 3 May 2010, Eric Paris wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > This does not apply to my tree, please fix. > > Patches sent should be applied in this order: > > re-introduce MAY_ACCESS > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127085147411199&w=2 > > LSM explicit masking > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127085147211188&w=2 > > SELinux audit_access > http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=127292585028408&w=2 > > open in common perms > http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=127111467103490&w=2 > > execmod in common perms > http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=127111467103486&w=2 > > If you prefer I can send them all again as a series or as a single mbox. > Or you can just apply them in the correct order.... I'm getting: security/selinux/hooks.c: In function selinux_inode_permission: security/selinux/hooks.c:2662: error: FILE__AUDIT_ACCESS undeclared (first use in this function) Looks like av_permissions.h is not being built. Can you resend all this as a patchset against my current tree ? -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
