On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 10:03 +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Wed, 5 May 2010, Eric Paris wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 08:50 +1000, James Morris wrote: > > > On Mon, 3 May 2010, Eric Paris wrote: > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > This does not apply to my tree, please fix. > > > > Patches sent should be applied in this order: > > > > re-introduce MAY_ACCESS > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127085147411199&w=2 > > This changes filesystem code (e.g. logic in NFS), but has no comments or > signoff from fs/vfs folk, as I indicated to you off-list. Do you think > it's ok to go in anyway? It changes NO logic, just breaks one flag into 2. If it does change any logic the patch is busted! So yes I believe it is perfectly safe to go in. I, however, poked Al again (about the 3rd time) just in case he has a better suggestion. -Eric -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
