Re: restorecon and chroot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/17/2010 01:14 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Why not just use setfiles, since you will need to specify the
>> file_context path anyways?
> 
> setfiles requires that you specify the full path of the file_contexts file, 
> this means that documentation that refers to it has to be distribution 
> specific to a certain extent and it's annoying to use.
> 
> Now if setfiles could default to using the same file_contexts file that 
> restorecon uses then that objection would go away.  Do you think we should 
> change setfiles in such a manner?
> 
Ok, so you want restorecon to use an alternate root dir.  I
misunderstood.  The reason I originally wrote restorecon was I got sick
of specifying the path.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxEWUgACgkQrlYvE4MpobN69gCgxJpwK5FMgbc58v5pcVOjL91E
0zcAnAroL61TitjY3WvBCHotKdE5Oq6a
=Qi/5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux