Re: Removing TE from the policy Model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 23:57 +0500, Shaz wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I have a mobile use case where TE is kind of too heavy ... if you
> remember from earlier threads that discussed the use case. Can I
> somehow use the SELinux infrastructure ... kernel and userspace to
> only use the rbac and uid models and leave out TE?
> 
> How much is it going to take as a technical effort and some fine
> guidelines will be appreciated.
> 
> Will it be called SELinux if we get it done in the first place?

TE (the mechanism) isn't particularly heavy, so I presume you mean the
policy configuration for it.  There are multiple options there:
- You can build a subset of refpolicy, similar to what Fedora does in
its selinux-policy-minimum package.  That will certainly yield a smaller
policy than a full refpolicy, but there are some fundamental limitations
on what you can achieve using that approach.

- You can construct your own policy from scratch, generating an initial
working one via scripts/selinux/mdp in the kernel source tree and then
expanding upon it.  That will yield the smallest possible policy.

- You could try the older SEEdit work by Hitachi Soft, although it isn't
being maintained anymore AFAIK.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux