Re: [PATCH] SELINUX: new permission controlling the ability to set suid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 13:57 -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> This is not default allow.  It is DAC + MAC as opposed to the way most
> >>> people run, which is just DAC. I am trying to make setattr check better.
> >>>
> >>> DAC + sudo versus DAC + MAC + SUDO.
> >>
> >> I thought that the intent of the current MAC / DAC interaction was
> >> that capabilities are used to decompose root and MAC can restrict
> >> capabilities on processes to add extra DAC protections. Now, I'll
> >> admit a good deal of ignorance here, but is there a reason that we
> >> can't just write policy using that mechanism to accomplish what you
> >> are after? If we prevented confined admin domains with root from
> >> having the needed capability to setuid files isn't that enough? Or if
> >> the right capability doesn't exist, can't you add a new capability?
> >>
> >> Karl
> > Write now the ability to setattr on a file gives you the ability to
> > chmod 4755 EXE on types you control.
> >
> > But we want to allow chmod 755 EXE but prevent chmod 4755.  Eric is
> > adding a Access check for this.
> 
> I understand that, but I (and I think others) are concerned about
> directly adding permissions for what is essentially DAC policy. I was
> wondering why the current strategy of mitigating DAC with SELinux
> through capabilities is not workable in this case. That has the
> additional benefit of allowing non-SELinux systems to benefit as well
> if new capabilities are needed.

Setting the suid bit on a file is not a privileged operation on
Unix/Linux, so there is no capability check on it and you can't add a
capability check to it without breaking Unix/Linux compatibility.  Any
user is free to create his own "entrypoints" to his own uid/gid in this
manner at present.  Dan wants to be able to prevent that, particularly
since he is trying to give a non-root user the ability to run confined
root shells.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux