Karl MacMillan wrote:
Accidentally sent this straight to Josh.
Karl
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Karl MacMillan<karlwmacmillan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I meant this - I don't want to pass around a boolean flag when we have
a flag for rule type. This allows cleanly adding support for, say,
generating both allow rules and auditallow rules at the same time.
-ENOATTACH
Karl
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Joshua Brindle<method@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 03/01/2010 03:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 03/01/2010 02:29 PM, Karl MacMillan wrote:
I'd rather pass in the rule type to the AVRule init rather than a
boolean about this being a dontaudit rule.
Karl
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Daniel J Walsh<dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
How about this patch. Moves the dontaudit up the chain a little bit.
Is this what you want.
One minor problem. Updated patch.
Karl?
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
