Accidentally sent this straight to Josh. Karl On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Karl MacMillan <karlwmacmillan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I meant this - I don't want to pass around a boolean flag when we have > a flag for rule type. This allows cleanly adding support for, say, > generating both allow rules and auditallow rules at the same time. > > Karl > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Joshua Brindle <method@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> >>> On 03/01/2010 03:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>> >>>> On 03/01/2010 02:29 PM, Karl MacMillan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'd rather pass in the rule type to the AVRule init rather than a >>>>> boolean about this being a dontaudit rule. >>>>> >>>>> Karl >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Daniel J Walsh<dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>> How about this patch. Moves the dontaudit up the chain a little bit. >>>> Is this what you want. >>> >>> One minor problem. Updated patch. >>> >> >> Karl? >> > -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
