Joshua Brindle wrote:
Paul Nuzzi wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 09:58 -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
I'd rather have separate ocontext structs for each system. That way it
is very easy to understand which ones apply to which system and you
don't get a crazy out of context ocontext struct.
I looked into having separate ocontext structs but that would involve
changing a lot of files making the patch much larger and more intrusive.
} u;
union {
uint32_t sclass; /* security class for genfs */
@@ -313,6 +323,17 @@ typedef struct genfs {
#define OCON_NODE6 6 /* IPv6 nodes */
#define OCON_NUM 7
+/* object context array indices for Xen */
+#define OCON_ISID 0 /* initial SIDs */
+#define OCON_PIRQ 1 /* physical irqs */
+#define OCON_IOPORT 2 /* io ports */
+#define OCON_IOMEM 3 /* io memory */
+#define OCON_DEVICE 4 /* pci devices */
+#define OCON_DUMMY1 5 /* reserved */
+#define OCON_DUMMY2 6 /* reserved */
+#define OCON_NUM 7
+
+
Should these be namespaced? What if<random other system> has io port
objects? You'd have to align them with each other and you have a mess of
keeping the numbers the same (you already do this with OCON_ISID)
Variables have been namespaced and there is no more overlap with
OCON_ISID.
Also we are relying on having the same number of OCON's which isn't good
I don't think. As much as I hate the policydb_compat_info (read: alot)
why aren't we using that to say how many ocons a xen policy really has?
OCON_NUM is now dynamically read through policydb_compat_info.
This is messy, why not an ocontext_selinux_free() and
ocontext_xen_free() (note: I realize the xen_free() one won't do
anything except freep the ocontext_t)
done.
len = buf[1];
- if (len != strlen(target_str)&&
- (!alt_target_str || len != strlen(alt_target_str))) {
- ERR(fp->handle, "policydb string length %zu does not match "
- "expected length %zu", len, strlen(target_str));
+ if (len> 32) {
magic number 32?
#defined.
Thanks for your input. Below is the updated patch for libsepol.
Acked-by: Joshua Brindle <method@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
for the entire patchset with the following diff on top:
diff --git a/checkpolicy/checkpolicy.c b/checkpolicy/checkpolicy.c
index 76d8ed3..c5fdf19 100644
--- a/checkpolicy/checkpolicy.c
+++ b/checkpolicy/checkpolicy.c
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ unsigned int policyvers = POLICYDB_VERSION_MAX;
void usage(char *progname)
{
printf
- ("usage: %s [-b] [-d] [-U handle_unknown (allow,deny,reject) [-M]"
- "[-c policyvers (%d-%d)] [-o output_file] [-t platform]"
+ ("usage: %s [-b] [-d] [-U handle_unknown (allow,deny,reject)] [-M]"
+ "[-c policyvers (%d-%d)] [-o output_file] [-t (selinux,xen)]"
"[input_file]\n",
progname, POLICYDB_VERSION_MIN, POLICYDB_VERSION_MAX);
exit(1);
Merged in checkpolicy 2.0.20, libsepol 2.0.39, sepolgen 1.0.18
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
