RE: SElinux protection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Stefano Carucci wrote:

> 
> 
> Two further questions:
> 
> 1. Does SELinux provide any countermeasure against buffer overflows attacks? 

Here's some information on memory protection checks which may be 
controlled via SELinux policy:

http://people.redhat.com/drepper/selinux-mem.html


> 2. I read about the possibility of keeping processes from forking. 
> Wouldn't you consider this as a protection from DoS attacks?

That could be effective in this case (as would resource limits), but 
SELinux is not generally designed to counteract DoS attacks.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux