Re: is it safe to use ext4 for SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:06 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 10:16 -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> > > I've just downloaded the fedora 11 livecd and am installing it on an
> > > imac. during the partition scheme should I use ext4,
> > > or stick with ext3 for SELinux to function properly?
> > 
> 
> > As to whether or not they all truly work, I don't know.
> > I have used ext4 though without any selinux problems, and btrfs has been
> > reported to work as well.
> 
> If you have problems with ext3, ext4, gfs2, or btrfs please file a
> bugzilla and it will be a high priority for us to fix.
> 
> -Eric
> 


Yeah I thought SELinux support was only for ext3,

Anyways At the moment I need to get the hang of this system, 
then later on experiment with the latest refpolicy.

As for any issues with any of the files system, no problem
I'll send a post to the appropriate vendor, about any issue,
if I run into such a thing.


Justin P. Mattock


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux