Re: Policy infrastructure problems and improvement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Apr 10, 2009, at 11:33 AM, James Carter wrote:

On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 09:51 -0500, Joe Nall wrote:

...

If Chris and Dan maintained and distributed policy as modules and not
as monolithic entities, the impetus and understanding to improve the
tool chain would be much stronger.

I am not sure I understand what you mean here.  Do you mean that if
Chris and Dan only maintained a part of the policy, while others
maintained the rest,

no

the difficulty in putting all the parts together
would provide strong motivation to improve the toolchain?

yes

 That may be
true, but it would make for a miserable existence for Chris and Dan.

Perhaps. They are smart guys, I suspect we would all benefit from their cleverness in avoiding the misery.

We have 118 (out of 402) different application rpms with policy in them. I'm experiencing the pain already :)

joe

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux