Re: Significance of the level on a port configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 18:44 +0100, Andy Warner wrote:
> Can someone give me a quick overview of the significance (i.e., the
> MLS behavior) of the port level for SELinux. 
> 
> I am attempting to have two connection from untrusted hosts that are
> statically labeled (with netlabelctl) one at high (s0) and one at low
> (s1). Both connections will be made over the same port number. The
> service accepting the connections runs at SystemHigh on Fedora 9 with
> MLS policy. What difference does the level of the port make ? Assume
> all TE rules are satisfied for the context of my question.
> 
I don't think the port level should make any difference.  Are there any
MLS constraints defined on any of the permission checks that are based
on port contexts?
> 
-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux