Re: odd policy behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 10:28 -0600, Xavier Toth wrote:
> I have an app that wasn't working in enforcing but there are no AVCs.
> So I did 'semodule -DB' to see if there were any dontaudit denials and
> restarted the app. The problem is that the app then ran fine. So I
> tried load_policy which had no affect and 'semodule -B' which makes it
> work. Any ideas what could be happening? I've verified with 'semodule
> --list' that the module is loaded prior to doing the 'semodule -B'.

- How was the app failing?
- Did you try running the app in permissive as well?
- Is this reproducible at all or are you unable to reproduce the
application failure now under any conditions?
- Did the app create/use any transient resources (temporary files,
system v ipc objects, etc) that could have prevented it from succeeding
on subsequent execution if they weren't properly cleaned up on prior
exit?

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux