-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07 2009, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:41 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 06 2009, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 08:51 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 06 2009, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Some non-Debian packages (like qmail, shudder) create users not below
>>>>>>>>>> MIN_UID, but above MAX_UID, in /etc/login.defs (non-system users are
>>>>>>>>>> supposed to have uids between MIN_UID and MAX_UID.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> genhomedircon.c:gethomedirs() checks pwent.pw_uid against MIN_UID in
>>>>>>>>>> /etc/login.defs to exclude system users from generating homedir
>>>>>>>>>> contexts. But unfortunately it does not check it against MAX_UID
>>>>>>>>>> setting from the same file.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This gets us lines like the following in the
>>>>>>>>>> contexts/files/file_contexts.homedirs file:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ,----
>>>>>>>>>> | #
>>>>>>>>>> | # Home Context for user user_u
>>>>>>>>>> | #
>>>>>>>>>> | /var/qmail/[^/]*/.+ user_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>> | /var/qmail/[^/]*/\.ssh(/.*)? user_u:object_r:user_home_ssh_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>> | /var/qmail/[^/]*/\.gnupg(/.+)? user_u:object_r:user_gpg_secret_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>> | /var/qmail/[^/]* -d user_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>> | /var/qmail/lost\+found/.* <<none>>
>>>>>>>>>> | /var/qmail -d system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>> | /var/qmail/\.journal <<none>>
>>>>>>>>>> | /var/qmail/lost\+found -d system_u:object_r:lost_found_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>> | /tmp/gconfd-.* -d user_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This commit adds checking uid value againt MAX_UID too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> src/genhomedircon.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>>>>>>> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/src/genhomedircon.c b/src/genhomedircon.c
>>>>>>>>>> index ce15807..a5306d7 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/src/genhomedircon.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/src/genhomedircon.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>>>>>> char *rbuf = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>> char *path = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>> long rbuflen;
>>>>>>>>>> - uid_t temp, minuid = 0;
>>>>>>>>>> - int minuid_set = 0;
>>>>>>>>>> + uid_t temp, minuid = 0, maxuid = 0;
>>>>>>>>>> + int minuid_set = 0, maxuid_set = 0;
>>>>>>>>>> struct passwd pwstorage, *pwbuf;
>>>>>>>>>> struct stat buf;
>>>>>>>>>> int retval;
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -270,6 +270,16 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> free(path);
>>>>>>>>>> path = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>> + path = semanage_findval(PATH_ETC_LOGIN_DEFS, "UID_MAX", NULL);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (path && *path) {
>>>>>>>>>> + temp = atoi(path);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!maxuid_set || temp > maxuid) {
>>>>>>>>>> + maxuid = temp;
>>>>>>>>>> + maxuid_set = 1;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> + free(path);
>>>>>>>>>> + path = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> path = semanage_findval(PATH_ETC_LIBUSER, "LU_UIDNUMBER", "=");
>>>>>>>>>> if (path && *path) {
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -286,6 +296,10 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>>>>>> minuid = 500;
>>>>>>>>>> minuid_set = 1;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!maxuid_set) {
>>>>>>>>>> + maxuid = 60000;
>>>>>>>>>> + maxuid_set = 1;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> rbuflen = sysconf(_SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX);
>>>>>>>>>> if (rbuflen <= 0)
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -295,7 +309,7 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>>>>>> goto fail;
>>>>>>>>>> setpwent();
>>>>>>>>>> while ((retval = getpwent_r(&pwstorage, rbuf, rbuflen, &pwbuf)) == 0) {
>>>>>>>>>> - if (pwbuf->pw_uid < minuid)
>>>>>>>>>> + if (pwbuf->pw_uid < minuid || pwbuf->pw_uid > maxuid)
>>>>>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>>>>>> if (!semanage_list_find(shells, pwbuf->pw_shell))
>>>>>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -322,7 +336,7 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* NOTE: old genhomedircon printed a warning on match */
>>>>>>>>>> if (hand.matched) {
>>>>>>>>>> - WARN(s->h_semanage, "%s homedir %s or its parent directory conflicts with a file context already specified in the policy. This usually indicates an incorrectly defined system account. If it is a system account please make sure its uid is less than %u or its login shell is /sbin/nologin.", pwbuf->pw_name, pwbuf->pw_dir, minuid);
>>>>>>>>>> + WARN(s->h_semanage, "%s homedir %s or its parent directory conflicts with a file context already specified in the policy. This usually indicates an incorrectly defined system account. If it is a system account please make sure its uid is less than %u or greater than %u or its login shell is /sbin/nologin.", pwbuf->pw_name, pwbuf->pw_dir, minuid, maxuid);
>>>>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>>>>> if (semanage_list_push(&homedir_list, path))
>>>>>>>>>> goto fail;
>>>>>>>>> I think the default MAX_UID is not big enough.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't it be MAXINT?
>>>>>>>> Not unless I am misunderstanding the logic here. The way I see
>>>>>>>> it, the code below:
>>>>>>>> ,----
>>>>>>>> | while ((retval = getpwent_r(&pwstorage, rbuf, rbuflen, &pwbuf)) == 0) {
>>>>>>>> | if (pwbuf->pw_uid < minuid || pwbuf->pw_uid > maxuid)
>>>>>>>> | continue;
>>>>>>>> | if (!semanage_list_find(shells, pwbuf->pw_shell))
>>>>>>>> | continue;
>>>>>>>> | if (strcmp(pwbuf->pw_dir, "/") == 0)
>>>>>>>> | continue;
>>>>>>>> | if (semanage_str_count(pwbuf->pw_dir, '/') <= 1)
>>>>>>>> | continue;
>>>>>>>> | if (!(path = strdup(pwbuf->pw_dir))) {
>>>>>>>> | break;
>>>>>>>> | }
>>>>>>>> | /* DO STUFF HERE */
>>>>>>>> | }
>>>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does nothing iff: pw_uid < minuid || pw_uid > maxuid, so it
>>>>>>>> only does things if the UID is in the range legal for non-system users;
>>>>>>>> and the UID range for system users is UID_MIN < uid < UID_MAX.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you change the upper bound to max int, then we will create
>>>>>>>> the entries for UIDs in the range above 60000 -- which is where the
>>>>>>>> bletcherous qmail install script places the qmail uid.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The current behaviour, but not checking the upper bound of the
>>>>>>>> acceptable user range would be equivalent to the raising the upper
>>>>>>>> bound to INT_MAX; and indeed, would make this patch redundant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From login.defs(5):
>>>>>>>> ,----
>>>>>>>> | UID_MAX (number), UID_MIN (number)
>>>>>>>> | Range of user IDs used for the creation of regular users by
>>>>>>>> | useradd or newusers.
>>>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Therefore I think that the right thing to do would be to check
>>>>>>>> for both the upper and the lower bound, not just the lower bound
>>>>>>>> check, which is all we do now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> manoj
>>>>>>> my point being, if I have a legitimate UID > 60000 for a real user and
>>>>>>> do not define UID_MAX, My account will not work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I do not have a problem with checking UID_MAX, just that the default
>>>>>>> should be much higer then 60000.
>>>>>> I just went with the Debian policy default value; 60000 is the
>>>>>> upper limit of uid's on Debian (and probably most Debian derivative)
>>>>>> machines, and UID's lager than that are reserved by policy for Debian
>>>>>> packages to use (after discussion on the development mailing lists).
>>>>> The same appears to be true in Fedora; UID_MAX is set to 60000 by
>>>>> default in /etc/login.defs there as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Having said that, I have no objection to making the default max
>>>>>> uid a preprocessor constant, which can be tweaked by the
>>>>>> distributions. Should I send in an updated patch?
>>>> Talking to Nalin, he thinks this number should be ignored, Imagine a
>>>> university with > 60000 students or a large government Department (Say
>>>> DOD), this will cause users with UID 600001 to not work correctly.
>>>>
>>>> UID_MAX is just there to tell useradd to give up when trying to find the
>>>> next available UID to add, it means nothing when you have a network of
>>>> Users.
>>> Is this not why we have /etc/login.defs in the first place?
>>> These installations should change UID_MAX to whatever makes
>>> sense for their site. Otherwise, we have a mismatch between stated
>>> policies (/etc/logindefs.conf) and practice, and I would much rather
>>> have our code follow the stated policy than not.
>> As Dan pointed out, the UID_MAX value in login.defs is only used by
>> useradd, and is not even strictly enforced (useradd -u 60002 john works
>> just fine). In an environment with a large number of users and a global
>> user database, you can certainly exceed 60000 users or you may even
>> happen to generate your uids in a manner that happens to put them all in
>> the upper part of the uid space. There are real systems with uids >
>> 60000 for real users, yet the login.defs UID_MAX value has not been
>> changed on such systems because it is irrelevant and it isn't enforced
>> by anything. So this patch would change behavior of libsemanage on such
>> systems in an undesirable manner. And it wouldn't help with cases like
>> oracle where the pseudo user is added via useradd without any specified
>> uid at all.
>>
>> I think Dan's earlier posting gets to more of the fundamental problems
>> with genhomedircon's heuristics for finding home directory locations,
>> and we need to address his points if we want it to work in general.
>
> Fair enough. In that case, I would like to point out that the
> current situation of only checking UID_MIN is causing actual problems
> right now on real user systems, and making genhomedircon to incorrectly
> guess where home directories exist.
>
> I'll treat this as an imperfect workaround until we fix
> semodule, and then I'll just revert the patch for Debian systems.
>
> manoj
What does the passwd entry that it is getting fooled by look like? Does
the account really need a real shell? IE Do people actually login to
the home directory?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkllElgACgkQrlYvE4MpobMD7wCg6fsXreti1IPpOW5rGab6IPl7
+KoAn3NUZUWxtyMnrUgXInLTsjiptglo
=lsLC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
