-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 08:51 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06 2009, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>>>> From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some non-Debian packages (like qmail, shudder) create users not below
>>>>>> MIN_UID, but above MAX_UID, in /etc/login.defs (non-system users are
>>>>>> supposed to have uids between MIN_UID and MAX_UID.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> genhomedircon.c:gethomedirs() checks pwent.pw_uid against MIN_UID in
>>>>>> /etc/login.defs to exclude system users from generating homedir
>>>>>> contexts. But unfortunately it does not check it against MAX_UID
>>>>>> setting from the same file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This gets us lines like the following in the
>>>>>> contexts/files/file_contexts.homedirs file:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,----
>>>>>> | #
>>>>>> | # Home Context for user user_u
>>>>>> | #
>>>>>> | /var/qmail/[^/]*/.+ user_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0
>>>>>> | /var/qmail/[^/]*/\.ssh(/.*)? user_u:object_r:user_home_ssh_t:s0
>>>>>> | /var/qmail/[^/]*/\.gnupg(/.+)? user_u:object_r:user_gpg_secret_t:s0
>>>>>> | /var/qmail/[^/]* -d user_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0
>>>>>> | /var/qmail/lost\+found/.* <<none>>
>>>>>> | /var/qmail -d system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0
>>>>>> | /var/qmail/\.journal <<none>>
>>>>>> | /var/qmail/lost\+found -d system_u:object_r:lost_found_t:s0
>>>>>> | /tmp/gconfd-.* -d user_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0
>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This commit adds checking uid value againt MAX_UID too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> src/genhomedircon.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>>> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/src/genhomedircon.c b/src/genhomedircon.c
>>>>>> index ce15807..a5306d7 100644
>>>>>> --- a/src/genhomedircon.c
>>>>>> +++ b/src/genhomedircon.c
>>>>>> @@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>> char *rbuf = NULL;
>>>>>> char *path = NULL;
>>>>>> long rbuflen;
>>>>>> - uid_t temp, minuid = 0;
>>>>>> - int minuid_set = 0;
>>>>>> + uid_t temp, minuid = 0, maxuid = 0;
>>>>>> + int minuid_set = 0, maxuid_set = 0;
>>>>>> struct passwd pwstorage, *pwbuf;
>>>>>> struct stat buf;
>>>>>> int retval;
>>>>>> @@ -270,6 +270,16 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> free(path);
>>>>>> path = NULL;
>>>>>> + path = semanage_findval(PATH_ETC_LOGIN_DEFS, "UID_MAX", NULL);
>>>>>> + if (path && *path) {
>>>>>> + temp = atoi(path);
>>>>>> + if (!maxuid_set || temp > maxuid) {
>>>>>> + maxuid = temp;
>>>>>> + maxuid_set = 1;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + free(path);
>>>>>> + path = NULL;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> path = semanage_findval(PATH_ETC_LIBUSER, "LU_UIDNUMBER", "=");
>>>>>> if (path && *path) {
>>>>>> @@ -286,6 +296,10 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>> minuid = 500;
>>>>>> minuid_set = 1;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> + if (!maxuid_set) {
>>>>>> + maxuid = 60000;
>>>>>> + maxuid_set = 1;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rbuflen = sysconf(_SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX);
>>>>>> if (rbuflen <= 0)
>>>>>> @@ -295,7 +309,7 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>> goto fail;
>>>>>> setpwent();
>>>>>> while ((retval = getpwent_r(&pwstorage, rbuf, rbuflen, &pwbuf)) == 0) {
>>>>>> - if (pwbuf->pw_uid < minuid)
>>>>>> + if (pwbuf->pw_uid < minuid || pwbuf->pw_uid > maxuid)
>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>> if (!semanage_list_find(shells, pwbuf->pw_shell))
>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>> @@ -322,7 +336,7 @@ static semanage_list_t *get_home_dirs(genhomedircon_settings_t * s)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* NOTE: old genhomedircon printed a warning on match */
>>>>>> if (hand.matched) {
>>>>>> - WARN(s->h_semanage, "%s homedir %s or its parent directory conflicts with a file context already specified in the policy. This usually indicates an incorrectly defined system account. If it is a system account please make sure its uid is less than %u or its login shell is /sbin/nologin.", pwbuf->pw_name, pwbuf->pw_dir, minuid);
>>>>>> + WARN(s->h_semanage, "%s homedir %s or its parent directory conflicts with a file context already specified in the policy. This usually indicates an incorrectly defined system account. If it is a system account please make sure its uid is less than %u or greater than %u or its login shell is /sbin/nologin.", pwbuf->pw_name, pwbuf->pw_dir, minuid, maxuid);
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> if (semanage_list_push(&homedir_list, path))
>>>>>> goto fail;
>>>>> I think the default MAX_UID is not big enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't it be MAXINT?
>>>> Not unless I am misunderstanding the logic here. The way I see
>>>> it, the code below:
>>>> ,----
>>>> | while ((retval = getpwent_r(&pwstorage, rbuf, rbuflen, &pwbuf)) == 0) {
>>>> | if (pwbuf->pw_uid < minuid || pwbuf->pw_uid > maxuid)
>>>> | continue;
>>>> | if (!semanage_list_find(shells, pwbuf->pw_shell))
>>>> | continue;
>>>> | if (strcmp(pwbuf->pw_dir, "/") == 0)
>>>> | continue;
>>>> | if (semanage_str_count(pwbuf->pw_dir, '/') <= 1)
>>>> | continue;
>>>> | if (!(path = strdup(pwbuf->pw_dir))) {
>>>> | break;
>>>> | }
>>>> | /* DO STUFF HERE */
>>>> | }
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> Does nothing iff: pw_uid < minuid || pw_uid > maxuid, so it
>>>> only does things if the UID is in the range legal for non-system users;
>>>> and the UID range for system users is UID_MIN < uid < UID_MAX.
>>>>
>>>> If you change the upper bound to max int, then we will create
>>>> the entries for UIDs in the range above 60000 -- which is where the
>>>> bletcherous qmail install script places the qmail uid.
>>>>
>>>> The current behaviour, but not checking the upper bound of the
>>>> acceptable user range would be equivalent to the raising the upper
>>>> bound to INT_MAX; and indeed, would make this patch redundant.
>>>>
>>>> From login.defs(5):
>>>> ,----
>>>> | UID_MAX (number), UID_MIN (number)
>>>> | Range of user IDs used for the creation of regular users by
>>>> | useradd or newusers.
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> Therefore I think that the right thing to do would be to check
>>>> for both the upper and the lower bound, not just the lower bound
>>>> check, which is all we do now.
>>>>
>>>> manoj
>>> my point being, if I have a legitimate UID > 60000 for a real user and
>>> do not define UID_MAX, My account will not work.
>>>
>>> I do not have a problem with checking UID_MAX, just that the default
>>> should be much higer then 60000.
>> I just went with the Debian policy default value; 60000 is the
>> upper limit of uid's on Debian (and probably most Debian derivative)
>> machines, and UID's lager than that are reserved by policy for Debian
>> packages to use (after discussion on the development mailing lists).
>
> The same appears to be true in Fedora; UID_MAX is set to 60000 by
> default in /etc/login.defs there as well.
>
>> Having said that, I have no objection to making the default max
>> uid a preprocessor constant, which can be tweaked by the
>> distributions. Should I send in an updated patch?
>
Talking to Nalin, he thinks this number should be ignored, Imagine a
university with > 60000 students or a large government Department (Say
DOD), this will cause users with UID 600001 to not work correctly.
UID_MAX is just there to tell useradd to give up when trying to find the
next available UID to add, it means nothing when you have a network of
Users.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkljhzoACgkQrlYvE4MpobPuSACfQBlP2aRK2MVWwtGy48+nXzCJ
o4gAoJqRBIyWl4XiRGvMZc6BmsQEFNAN
=UGGE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
