Paul Moore wrote:
Smack needs to call netlbl_skbuff_err() to let NetLabel do the necessary
protocol specific error handling.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 87d7541..6e2dc0b 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -2179,7 +2179,10 @@ static int smack_socket_sock_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
* This is the simplist possible security model
* for networking.
*/
- return smk_access(smack, ssp->smk_in, MAY_WRITE);
+ rc = smk_access(smack, ssp->smk_in, MAY_WRITE);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ netlbl_skbuff_err(skb, rc, 0);
+ return rc;
}
/**
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
