Re: Request for multiple mailing lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Andy Warner wrote:

> Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Friday 08 August 2008 03:47, Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > SELinux without policy is like a book without pages. Think of
> > > the reference policy as the pages of the Old Testament.
> > >
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisegesis
> >
> > The problem with such analogies is that SE Linux policy is designed to be
> > unambiguous.  See the above URL for details of the issue.
> >
> >
> Is that supposed to be funny or just an great example of someone posting way
> off topic demonstrating the need for multiple mailing lists?

There is nothing inherently funny with being logical and demanding
precision. Russell Coker's comment was quite good and to the point. You
should not compare SELinux policies, which are clear and precise, with
ancient mythology, and expect that everyone buys it. This world is full
of so-called Holy Books, after all.

This list should focus on SELinux issues.

Best regards,
vmk
-- 
************************************************************************
               Tietotekniikkaosasto / Helsingin yliopisto
                 IT Department / University of Helsinki
************************************************************************

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux