On Thursday 03 July 2008 12:16:27 pm Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 10:32 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Thursday 03 July 2008 9:47:58 am Christian Kuester wrote: > > > Hi List, > > > > > > I had a small conversation with Stephen Smalley on the > > > fedora-selinux-list about an easy way to add > > > (local) nodecon's on a SELinux enabled system. As this is not > > > implemented in semanage yet > > > he gave me the advice to revive a discussion[1] on this list from > > > 2006. It began because a patch against > > > semanage was posted which enabled nodecon support. It seems that > > > the patch never got commited > > > because it didn't work as expected. > > > > Hello, > > > > I think the idea of adding network node support to semanage is a > > good one. Unfortunately I have no experience with python or > > semanage so I'm probably not the best person to provide coding > > advice or help. > > > > Who does look after semanage these days? > > Yes, I agree that we ought to support this functionality, especially > as libsemanage already provides the interfaces even if there are > lingering issues in the implementation. > > Joshua can likely help with the libsemanage/libsepol side and Dan > with the semanage front end side. Great, I'll try to help out as much as I can - this could be motivation to try and learn some python. > Christian - do you have a re-based copy of the patch against the svn > trunk that you were testing with? Christian, if you do have an updated/re-based patch, would you mind posting it? -- paul moore linux @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
