On Saturday 29 March 2008 00:51, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Isn't that an argument for keeping non-MLS support? ;) > > I don't believe that it actually does significantly increase policy > build time (or if it does, that would be a bug). Possibly Russell just > means that building both MLS and non-MLS takes longer, or that the mls > modules.conf includes more modules, or something along those lines? Yes. Currently I have it building three policy packages, strict, targeted, and mls. This takes 50% longer than just strict and targeted. But if we go to a single policy for strict/targeted and a policy for mls then we would have the same build times as before. -- russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Blog http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
