Re: USER_AVC vs USER_MAC_POLICY_LOAD ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 26 March 2008 09:26:48 Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Using a separate type makes sense to me. 

OK, in the next audit release, there will be a new type:

#define AUDIT_USER_MAC_POLICY_LOAD  2310


> But it may require a change/extension to the libselinux callback
> interface - there isn't a way to convey such type information presently
> I think.

Hmm...I haven't checked lately either.


> However, isn't there a separate issue with regard to the above dbus
> message - the "Can't send to audit system" part?

Right, I thought about altering the message so we didn't go down that 
path.  :)

-Steve

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux