On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:01 +1100, James Morris wrote: > > Any further thoughts on how to push the secmark integration forward? > > > > The secmark table patch should allow MAC rules to be administered > > independently, and I know there has been some demand for the new (well, > > now not so new) networking controls. > > Has the secmark table patch gone upstream yet? Nope. I think we need to know that it's going to be useful first. -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
